Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
-
0.9.2
-
None
-
Ubuntu 12.04
Description
Hello,
I'm working on a Thrift Client/Server app for a while. I was working with 0.9.1 successfully and I wanted to try the 0.9.2.
I now get a segfault when my client tries to reach the server:
Thread [19] 14167 [core: 6] (Suspended : Signal : SIGSEGV:Segmentation fault)
apache::thrift::transport::TTransport::readAll() at TTransport.h:126 0x1f4ac60
apache::thrift::protocol::TBinaryProtocolT<apache::thrift::transport::TTransport>::readI32() at TBinaryProtocol.tcc:375 0x1f63794
apache::thrift::protocol::TBinaryProtocolT<apache::thrift::transport::TTransport>::readMessageBegin() at TBinaryProtocol.tcc:206 0x1f62fa5
apache::thrift::protocol::TVirtualProtocol<apache::thrift::protocol::TBinaryProtocolT<apache::thrift::transport::TTransport>, apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocolDefaults>::readMessageBegin_virt() at TVirtualProtocol.h:432 0x1f61d0e
apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol::readMessageBegin() at TProtocol.h:531 0x26ca66e
apache::thrift::TDispatchProcessor::process() at TDispatchProcessor.h:113 0x26cac59
apache::thrift::server::TSimpleServer::serve() at TSimpleServer.cpp:100 0x7ffff0cbb714
evitech::ConfigurationThriftServer::open() at ConfigurationThriftServer.cpp:111 0x26c8c0e
evitech::DistantConfigurationManager::execute() at DistantConfigurationManager.cpp:62 0x26d22c2
evitech::Task::runOneIteration() at Task.cpp:408 0x26f8eec
<...more frames...>
On the server side, I have a C++ app with (snapshot of code):
_processor.reset(new jaguar_configuration::JaguarConfigurationServiceProcessor(_handler));
_protocolFactory.reset(new apache::thrift::protocol::TBinaryProtocolFactory());
_serverTransport.reset(new apache::thrift::transport::TServerSocket(_serverPort));
_transportFactory.reset(new apache::thrift::transport::TBufferedTransportFactory());
_server.reset(new apache::thrift::server::TSimpleServer(_processor, _serverTransport, _transportFactory, _protocolFactory));
_server.serve();
On the client side, I run a python app with:
- TSocket
- TBufferedTransport
- TBinaryProtocol
Here is the method I use (idl):
void keep_alive(1: string identifier) throws (1:InvalidOperation op),
I'm probably doing something wrong, but I've no idea what. I've seen in wireshark that I'm indeed sending the correct data on the correct side. If you need more samples to investigate let me know.
What could have changed between 0.9.1 and 0.9.2 that could give me this result ?
Thanks in advance,
J. Greard