[SOLR-9180] need better cloud & RTG testing of TestPseudoReturnFields

• Type: Test
• Status: Closed
• Priority: Major
• Resolution: Fixed
• Fix Version/s: 6.2, 7.0
• Assignee: Chris M. Hostetter
• Reporter: Chris M. Hostetter
• Created: 01/Jun/16 18:15
• Updated: 26/Aug/16 13:58
• Resolved: 06/Jul/16 21:29

Description

on the mailing list, Charles Sanders noted that the [explain] transformer wasn't working in Solr 5(.5.1) - showing a sample query that indicated he was using SolrCloud.

In 6.0 and on master this works fine, so whatever bug affects 5.x was fixed at some point – but we don't appear to have any cloud based tests that invoke [explain], so we should add something akin to TestPseudoReturnFields to ensure no regressions in the future.

Issue Links

• is related to: SOLR-9285 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when ValueSourceAugmenter used with RTG on uncommitted doc
• is related to: SOLR-9286 SolrCloud RTG: psuedo-fields (like ValueSourceAugmenter, [shard], etc...) silently fails (even for committed doc)
• is related to: SOLR-9287 single node RTG: NPE if score is requested
• relates to: SOLR-9288 RTG: fl=[docid] silently missing for uncommitted docs
• relates to: SOLR-9289 SolrCloud RTG: fl=[docid] silently ignored for all docs
• relates to: SOLR-9308 SolrCloud RTG doesn't forward any params to shards, causes fqs & non-default fl params to be ignored
• relates to: SOLR-9309 SolrCloud RTG with multiple "id" params has inconsistent behavior if only 0 or 1 ids are returned
• relates to: SOLR-9314 Add all known transformers to TestRandomFlRTGCloud and fix any bugs found