Solr
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-5142 Block Indexing / Join Improvements
  3. SOLR-5210

amend example's schema.xml and solrconfig.xml for blockjoin support

    Details

    • Type: Sub-task Sub-task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 4.5, master
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Activity

      Hide
      Markus Jelsma added a comment -

      Yes! I haven't really followed block join support and could get to know it via reading unit tests and their config files. But if it is integrated in the main example, it would safe me and everyone else some time

      Show
      Markus Jelsma added a comment - Yes! I haven't really followed block join support and could get to know it via reading unit tests and their config files. But if it is integrated in the main example, it would safe me and everyone else some time
      Hide
      Mikhail Khludnev added a comment -

      Hence, click Vote!

      Show
      Mikhail Khludnev added a comment - Hence, click Vote!
      Hide
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment -

      Commit 1520081 from Yonik Seeley in branch 'dev/trunk'
      [ https://svn.apache.org/r1520081 ]

      SOLR-5210: add block join support to example

      Show
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment - Commit 1520081 from Yonik Seeley in branch 'dev/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1520081 ] SOLR-5210 : add block join support to example
      Hide
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment -

      Commit 1520082 from Yonik Seeley in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x'
      [ https://svn.apache.org/r1520082 ]

      SOLR-5210: add block join support to example

      Show
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment - Commit 1520082 from Yonik Seeley in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1520082 ] SOLR-5210 : add block join support to example
      Hide
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment -

      Commit 1521559 from Robert Muir in branch 'dev/trunk'
      [ https://svn.apache.org/r1521559 ]

      SOLR-5210: make perSegFilter cache actually per-segment

      Show
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment - Commit 1521559 from Robert Muir in branch 'dev/trunk' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1521559 ] SOLR-5210 : make perSegFilter cache actually per-segment
      Hide
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment -

      Commit 1521564 from Robert Muir in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x'
      [ https://svn.apache.org/r1521564 ]

      SOLR-5210: make perSegFilter cache actually per-segment

      Show
      ASF subversion and git services added a comment - Commit 1521564 from Robert Muir in branch 'dev/branches/branch_4x' [ https://svn.apache.org/r1521564 ] SOLR-5210 : make perSegFilter cache actually per-segment
      Hide
      Adrien Grand added a comment -

      4.5 release -> bulk close

      Show
      Adrien Grand added a comment - 4.5 release -> bulk close
      Hide
      Tadas Dailyda added a comment -

      I might be wrong here but to me it seems that

      {!child}

      queries don't work when root field is not stored (return all indexed documents).

      SVN commit which is referred to in the original description (r1513290) has root field with stored="true" in schema. However r1520082 has stored="false". And this remains so in latest Solr releases.

      So I am making a conclusion that distributed "solr" example actually doesn't properly work with block joins.

      Or maybe I should open a new issue for this?

      Show
      Tadas Dailyda added a comment - I might be wrong here but to me it seems that {!child} queries don't work when root field is not stored (return all indexed documents). SVN commit which is referred to in the original description (r1513290) has root field with stored="true" in schema. However r1520082 has stored="false". And this remains so in latest Solr releases. So I am making a conclusion that distributed "solr" example actually doesn't properly work with block joins. Or maybe I should open a new issue for this?

        People

        • Assignee:
          Yonik Seeley
          Reporter:
          Mikhail Khludnev
        • Votes:
          2 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          6 Start watching this issue

          Dates

          • Created:
            Updated:
            Resolved:

            Development