Uploaded image for project: 'Solr'
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-440

Should use longs for internal DateField storage

Attach filesAttach ScreenshotVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • 1.2, 1.3
    • None
    • search
    • None

    Description

      The current DateField implementation uses formatted Strings internally to store dates.

      As a user creating a schema, I assumed that using the DateField type would be more efficient than using an integer field to store seconds. In fact, the DateField type is currently significantly less efficient: ~20 extra bytes are required per value, and String sorting requires that all values fit in memory.

      As soon as sorting on long fields has been implemented (SOLR-324), I'd suggest that the date implementation be switched to use long values internally, representing milliseconds since the epoch in UTC. Unfortunately, this will cause index incompatibilities, so the schema version will need to be bumped.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            stuhood Stu Hood
            Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment