Solr
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-2866

Marked synonym filter for selective token expansion

    Details

      Description

      Hi everybody,

      My name is Victor van der Wolf and since recently I work for the Royal Library in the Netherlands. One of my first assignments here was to see if I could implement some stemming algorithm for our websites. Our search engine is solr/lucene 3.4.

      Basically I had 2 requirements to work with:

      1) It should be possible to switch the stemming functionality on and off in the front end
      2) No extra storage should be required (no extra indexing).

      I shortly came to the conclusion that it would be practical to use the SynonymFilter to do that. I got hold of a dutch library and used a stemming algorithm to generate a synonym file on that.

      Then I thought that I could maybe use 2 different query analyzers under the "field type" and then call one or the other depending if I want stemming or not, like this q=<field>:<analyzer>:<search term>. Unfortunately this did not seem possible.

      Then, after some discussions with Erick Erickson, it became clear that a good approach could be to write my own SynonymFilter and apply some kind of token marking to decide it that token should be "synonymized" or not. Well, I did just that and it works like a charm.

      I would like to contribute this MarkedSynonymFilter class to the project.

      I used the SynonymFilter class as a starting point and added some extra functionality to that. First of all, I added 3 new parameters called lookup, preMark and postmark. The preMark and postmark parameters contain some kind of pre- and suffix to recognize if a token should be "synonymized" or not. A simple regex is used to determine this. Then the lookup parameter determines the behaviour of the MarkedSynonymFilter:

      lookup=marked - marked tokens will be synonymized
      lookup=unmarked - unmarked tokens will be synonymized
      lookup=all - all tokens should be synonymized
      lookup=none - none of the tokens should be synonymized

      I started out writing this based on version 3.3, later I discovered that we were using 3.4 and I had to upgrade it. Unfortunately the whole SynonymFilter code has been revised and for the moment there is the Slow and the Fast synonym filter where the Slow one if depricated. My addition is based on the slow version I am afraid.

      Anyway, I am curious about your comments. Please let me know if I should go forward with this and create a JIRA issue + my code as a patch.

      Cheers,

      Victor van der Wolf

      1. MarkedSynonymFilterFactory.java
        3 kB
        Victor van der Wolf
      2. SlowMarkedSynonymFilter.java
        11 kB
        Victor van der Wolf
      3. SlowMarkedSynonymFilterFactory.java
        7 kB
        Victor van der Wolf

        Activity

        No work has yet been logged on this issue.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Victor van der Wolf
          • Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Development