Uploaded image for project: 'Solr'
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-1776

dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 1.5, 3.1, 4.0-ALPHA
    • None
    • None

    Description

      the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely useless w/o specifying the "qf" param, but for the life of me i can't think of any good reason why it shouldn't use IndexSchema.getDefaultSearchFieldName() as teh default value for hte qf param.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          is cloned by

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. SOLR-3440 CLONE - dismax and edismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf

          • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Closed
          is related to

          Improvement - An improvement or enhancement to an existing feature or task. SOLR-3534 dismax and edismax should default to "df" when "qf" is absent.

          • Minor - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Closed

          Activity

            People

              hossman Chris M. Hostetter
              hossman Chris M. Hostetter
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: