There are two places on the page describing servicemix classloaders where the
nonOverridable element is misspelled as nonOverrideable. The link to the erroneous page is:
If I had copied and pasted from the doc,
I would no doubt have gotten an xml parsing error. But I read the documentation and just
typed it in manually and picked the wrong spelling. I didn't get any runtime error on the xml - it apparently just ignored my misspelled element. So it took me a long time to figure out what the real problem was.
I finally looked at your source code to see that it was looking for nonOverridable.
The two places to be fixed look like:
The documentation should be fixed as soon as possible as it it quite confusing and misleading.
If there were some way to have the code check for unknown elements and give
an error or at least a warning, that would be even better.