Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
API 2.16.4
-
None
Description
Status quo
A consumer of the UriProvider currently is required to handle an unchecked IllegalArgumentException, which is thrown when the provider is not able to handle the binary. Note that it is not supposed to ever return null per the javadoc. The JcrNodeResource shows a typical consumer code (although it still does do a null check).
For the use case of asking multiple providers and taking the first one that responds it's not an optimal pattern to rely on an unchecked exception for the expected failure case that one provider by design cannot handle a certain binary or request. Throwing an IllegalArgumentException if there is no problem with the argument passed from the client, but a limit or configuration setting of the provider, is misleading. Also, given there are multiple providers active, a client cannot know upfront which provider is the right one for a given binary and somehow prevent the "illegal argument" call in the first place.
Suggestion
Often, null return values are used in such a case. The provider can log any possible useful information itself, on why it could not handle it, if needed. This would simplify the consumer code (no try/catch necessary) and remove unnecessary cost of exception handling for normal code paths. JcrNodeResource itself it uses a null return value to pass on the "could not retrieve anything" state to the upper layers.
If the goal really is to use exceptions here, the API should add a @Nonnull annotation for the return value and the expected failure exception should be a checked one such as a new UriProviderException. Then for any unexpected faults (e.g. network error), it's fine to allow providers to throw a unchecked runtime exception, and usually that's not something that is explicitly mentioned in javadoc, but would definitely not hurt.