[PHOENIX-2990] Ensure documentation on "time/date" datatypes/functions acknowledge lack of JDBC compliance

• Type: Task
• Status: Closed
• Priority: Major
• Resolution: Fixed
• Fix Version/s: 4.9.0, 4.8.1
• Assignee: Josh Elser
• Reporter: Josh Elser
• Created: 13/Jun/16 18:59
• Updated: 28/Sep/16 05:15
• Resolved: 01/Sep/16 17:01

Description

In talking with speleato about some differences in test cases between the thick and thin driver and DATE/TIMESTAMP datatypes, Sergio asked me if the docs were accurate on the Phoenix website about this.

Taking a look at Data Types and Functions documentation, we don't outwardly warn users that these are not 100% compliant with the JDBC APIs.

We do have the issue tracked in JIRA in PHOENIX-868 (and more, i'm sure), but it would be good to make sure the website is also forward in warning users.

Issue Links

• is related to: PHOENIX-868 Make Time, Date, and Timestamp handling JDBC-compliant