Uploaded image for project: 'Phoenix'
  1. Phoenix
  2. PHOENIX-2990

Ensure documentation on "time/date" datatypes/functions acknowledge lack of JDBC compliance

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 4.9.0, 4.8.1
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      In talking with Sergio Peleato about some differences in test cases between the thick and thin driver and DATE/TIMESTAMP datatypes, Sergio asked me if the docs were accurate on the Phoenix website about this.

      Taking a look at Data Types and Functions documentation, we don't outwardly warn users that these are not 100% compliant with the JDBC APIs.

      We do have the issue tracked in JIRA in PHOENIX-868 (and more, i'm sure), but it would be good to make sure the website is also forward in warning users.

        Attachments

        1. PHOENIX-2990.diff
          3 kB
          Josh Elser
        2. PHOENIX-2990.002.diff
          3 kB
          Josh Elser

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                elserj Josh Elser
                Reporter:
                elserj Josh Elser
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: