Uploaded image for project: 'Commons OGNL (Dormant)'
  1. Commons OGNL (Dormant)
  2. OGNL-7

Full Java 5 Support for OGNL

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • New Feature
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 2.7.2
    • Core Runtime
    • None

    Description

      Although xwork has been able to work around it, it seems like it would be better if OGNL supported 1.5 out-of-the-box. Particularly it seems like there are places where we should be passing ParameterizedType instead of Class so the generic type is passed along with the base class type.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              Unassigned Unassigned
              tschneider22 Tom Schneider
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: