Resolution: Won't Fix
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
while trying to simplify the property-index definitions and adding
one for the access control content, i detected the following inconsistencies
with the property "propertyNames":
- the property is sometimes single valued (e.g. "uuid") and sometimes
IMO the property name implies that it is multivalued. however, i get the
impression that this doesn't work for unique property index definitions.
- the property is defined using Type.STRING (implicit) or Type.STRINGS.
IMO however, Type.NAMES would be more appropriate.
- while moving out the user related index, i used type name without noticing.
i will change to STRING(S) such that we have it consistent (see above).
angela made changes -
|Field||Original Value||New Value|
|Component/s||core [ 12317803 ]|
Alex Parvulescu made changes -
|Assignee||Alex Parvulescu [ alex.parvulescu ]|
Michael Dürig made changes -
|Status||Open [ 1 ]||Resolved [ 5 ]|
|Resolution||Won't Fix [ 2 ]|
Jukka Zitting made changes -
|Status||Resolved [ 5 ]||Closed [ 6 ]|
|Transition||Time In Source Status||Execution Times||Last Executer||Last Execution Date|
|36d 4h 14m||1||Michael Dürig||01/Mar/13 15:22|
|66d 33m||1||Jukka Zitting||06/May/13 16:55|