Details
-
New Feature
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
i just run into another place where i would need to work around
missing support for the current (".") and parent ("..") element
in the TreeLocation.
IMO it would make sense to add this to TreeLocation#getChild... maybe
even rename it to TreeLocation#getLocation(String relativePath)?
Attachments
Issue Links
- blocks
-
OAK-369 missing support for relative path consisting of parent-element
- Closed
-
OAK-50 Implement User Management
- Closed
- is related to
-
OAK-309 ParentNodeTest fails (XPath parent node navigation using "..")
- Closed
- relates to
-
OAK-732 Change TreeLocation.getChild() to only accept direct child nodes (not relative paths)
- Closed