Description
This is the simplest case for OAK-3973. This is about the most basic case where a suggestion/spellcheck query with:
- single isdescendantnode() clause
- unambiguous index def (unlike OAK-3992)
- no union (unlike OAK-3993)
should work. That means that we should be able to work with: - index on root and descendant clause on a sub-tree
- index on say "/a" and descendant clause also on "/a"
- index on say "/a" and descendant clause on "/a/b"
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
OAK-4167 Collect and backport lucene based suggestion improvements done in 1.4 into 1.2 branch
- Closed