Uploaded image for project: 'Maven Skins'
  1. Maven Skins
  2. MSKINS-131

Enable the responsive features of Bootstrap 2.3.2

Agile BoardAttach filesAttach ScreenshotVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • fluido-1.5
    • fluido-1.6
    • Fluido Skin
    • None
    • All
    • Patch

    Description

      Bootstrap 2.3.2 has opt-in support for responsive layouts. In 2016, mobile has grown a lot. I think it should be enabled.

      To enable it, we just have to download bootstrap-responsive.css from http://getbootstrap.com/2.3.2/ and add it to the page. See http://getbootstrap.com/2.3.2/scaffolding.html#responsive

      The following mail was sent to the mailing list:

      I tried enabling Bootstrap's 2 responsive mode on
      https://maven.apache.org and I thought that it was better than the
      current version. Please see a demo here: http://jonenst.github.io/maven-site/ .
      I also added preview images of the main the page using firefox
      "Responsive Design View".

      The only difference between the two types of images is the inclusion
      of the responsive css as per
      http://getbootstrap.com/2.3.2/scaffolding.html#responsive .

      Note that the responsive mode does significant changes only on
      displays of width 767 pixels or less. Above 767px, the changes are very
      minor (tiny adjustments to fonts, columns and gutters sizes).

      Did you try enabling the responsive mode? Was there something
      preventing you from using it ? The only drawback I see is that devices
      with 767 pixels have a bigger menu than needed, but:

      • the current mode already has some problems (text and images going
        outside of the menu, less size of the content).
      • there are almost no devices in the 610-767 range. (see
        http://mydevice.io/devices/ ). For 600px width, the menu still looks
        big but not as oversized as for 767 pixels and using it this way is an
        improvement.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            michael-o Michael Osipov
            jonenst Jon Harper
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment