Uploaded image for project: 'Hadoop Map/Reduce'
  1. Hadoop Map/Reduce
  2. MAPREDUCE-1639

Grouping using hashing instead of sorting

Add voteVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • New Feature
    • Status: Open
    • Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None

    Description

      most applications of map-reduce care about grouping and not sorting. Sorting is a (relatively expensive) way to achieve grouping. In order to achieve just grouping - one can:

      • replace the sort on the Mappers with a HashTable - and maintain lists of key-values against each hash-bucket.
      • key-value tuples inside each hash bucket are sorted - before spilling or sending to Reducer. Anytime this is done - Combiner can be invoked.
      • HashTable is serialized by hash-bucketid. So merges (of either spills or Map Outputs) works similar to today (at least there's no change in overall compute complexity of merge)

      Of course this hashtable has nothing to do with partitioning. it's just a replacement for map-side sort.

      this is (pretty much) straight from the MARS project paper: http://www.cse.ust.hk/catalac/papers/mars_pact08.pdf. They report a 45% speedup in inverted index calculation using hashing instead of sorting (reference implementation is NOT against Hadoop though).

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            jsensarma Joydeep Sen Sarma

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:

              Slack

                Issue deployment