Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 8.10
    • None
    • None
    • New

    Description

      As benchmarks suggested major savings and minor slowdowns with larger block sizes, I had increased them on LUCENE-9486. However it looks like this slowdown is still problematic for some users, so I plan to go back to a smaller block size, something like 10*16kB to get closer to the amount of data we had to decompress per document when we had 16kB blocks without shared dictionaries.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              Unassigned Unassigned
              jpountz Adrien Grand
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Time Tracking

                  Estimated:
                  Original Estimate - Not Specified
                  Not Specified
                  Remaining:
                  Remaining Estimate - 0h
                  0h
                  Logged:
                  Time Spent - 20m
                  20m

                  Slack

                    Issue deployment