Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Open
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
New
Description
By profiling an Elasticsearch cluster, I found the private method UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.isPointQuery to be quite expensive due to the clazz.getSimpleName() call.
Here is an excerpt from hot_threads:
java.lang.Class.getEnclosingMethod0(Native Method) java.lang.Class.getEnclosingMethodInfo(Class.java:1072) java.lang.Class.getEnclosingClass(Class.java:1272) java.lang.Class.getSimpleBinaryName(Class.java:1443) java.lang.Class.getSimpleName(Class.java:1309) org.apache.lucene.search.UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.isPointQuery(UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.java:39) org.apache.lucene.search.UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.isCostly(UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.java:54) org.apache.lucene.search.UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.minFrequencyToCache(UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.java:121) org.apache.lucene.search.UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.shouldCache(UsageTrackingQueryCachingPolicy.java:179) org.elasticsearch.index.shard.ElasticsearchQueryCachingPolicy.shouldCache(ElasticsearchQueryCachingPolicy.java:53) org.apache.lucene.search.LRUQueryCache$CachingWrapperWeight.bulkScorer(LRUQueryCache.java:806) org.elasticsearch.indices.IndicesQueryCache$CachingWeightWrapper.bulkScorer(IndicesQueryCache.java:168) org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:665) org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:472) org.elasticsearch.search.query.QueryPhase.execute(QueryPhase.java:388) org.elasticsearch.search.query.QueryPhase.execute(QueryPhase.java:108)