Details
-
Task
-
Status: Open
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
6.0
-
None
-
None
-
New
Description
There are three different spatial implementations circulating at the moment, and nobody seems happy with the naming of them. For each implementation strategy, we need both a module name and a descriptive technology name that we can use to distinguish one from the other. I would expect the following people to have an interest in this process: rcmuir, dsmiley, mikemccand, etc.