Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 5.0, 6.0
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Lucene Fields:
      New

      Description

      Like LUCENE-6006, here's another pre-cursor for LUCENE-6005
      ... because I think it's important to nail down Lucene's low-schema
      (FieldType/FieldInfos) semantics before adding a high-schema.

      IndexableFieldType.indexed() is redundant with
      IndexableFieldType.indexOptions() != null, so we should remove it,
      codecs shouldn't have to write/read it, high-schema should not configure it, etc.

      Similarly, the FieldInfo.indexed bit is redundant, so I removed it, but I
      left the sugar API (FieldInfo.isIndexed) and implement it as just
      checking IndexOptions != null.

        Attachments

        1. LUCENE-6013.patch
          84 kB
          Michael McCandless
        2. LUCENE-6013.patch
          84 kB
          Michael McCandless
        3. LUCENE-6013.patch
          90 kB
          Michael McCandless
        4. LUCENE-6013.patch
          91 kB
          Michael McCandless

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              mikemccand Michael McCandless
              Reporter:
              mikemccand Michael McCandless
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: