[LUCENE-5199] Improve LuceneTestCase.defaultCodecSupportsDocsWithField to check the actual DocValuesFormat used per-field

• Type: Improvement
• Status: Reopened
• Priority: Major
• Resolution: Unresolved
• Fix Version/s: 4.9, 6.0
• Component/s: general/test
• Lucene Fields: New, Patch Available
• Assignee: Shai Erera
• Reporter: Shai Erera
• Created: 03/Sep/13 12:04
• Updated: 28/Aug/22 13:52

Description

On LUCENE-5178 Han reported the following test failure:

[junit4] FAILURE 0.27s | TestRangeAccumulator.testMissingValues <<<
   [junit4]    > Throwable #1: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...(0)
   [junit4]    >   less than 10 ([8)
   [junit4]    >   less than or equal to 10 (]8)
   [junit4]    >   over 90 (8)
   [junit4]    >   9...> but was:<...(0)
   [junit4]    >   less than 10 ([28)
   [junit4]    >   less than or equal to 10 (2]8)
   [junit4]    >   over 90 (8)
   [junit4]    >   9...>
   [junit4]    > 	at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([815B6AA86D05329C:EBC638EE498F066D]:0)
   [junit4]    > 	at org.apache.lucene.facet.range.TestRangeAccumulator.testMissingValues(TestRangeAccumulator.java:670)
   [junit4]    > 	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)

which can be reproduced with

tcase=TestRangeAccumulator -Dtests.method=testMissingValues -Dtests.seed=815B6AA86D05329C -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.postingsformat=Lucene41 -Dtests.locale=ca -Dtests.timezone=Australia/Currie -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8

It seems that the Codec that is picked is a Lucene45Codec with Lucene42DVFormat, which does not support docsWithFields for numericDV. We should improve LTC.defaultCodecSupportsDocsWithField to take a list of fields and check that the actual DVF used for each field supports it.