On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Nick Pellow <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> That would be great if you could forward this to firstname.lastname@example.org.
> The license is available to anyone working on the org.apache.* be it
> in IDEA/Eclipse/Ant/Maven locally, or on a central build server.
> Since the license will only instrument and report coverage on
> org.apache packages, please mention that it is fine to commit this
> license to each project if it makes running builds easier. ie just
> check out the project and run with Clover, without the need for the
> extra step of locating and installing the clover license.
> On 19/12/2009, at 1:11 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>> Woops, I meant "The only restriction is that it will only test
>> coverage of packages under org.apache", below.
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Michael McCandless
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Since this generous offer extends beyond Lucene...
>>> I'd like to forward this to firstname.lastname@example.org, pointing to where
>>> the license is available
>>> over/2.6.x), explaining that Lucene upgraded (providing the link to
>>> our coverage report), etc.
>>> But I wanted to confirm with you all first: is this OK? This
>>> license may be used by anyone? The only restriction is that it will
>>> only test coverage of packages under org.apache.lucene?
>>> I can draft something up and run it by you all first, if this makes