Uploaded image for project: 'Lucene - Core'
  1. Lucene - Core
  2. LUCENE-2608

Allow for specification of spell checker accuracy when calling suggestSimilar

        Details

        • Type: Improvement
        • Status: Closed
        • Priority: Major
        • Resolution: Fixed
        • Affects Version/s: None
        • Fix Version/s: 3.1, 4.0-ALPHA
        • Component/s: modules/spellchecker
        • Labels:
          None
        • Lucene Fields:
          New

          Description

          There is really no need for accuracy to be a class variable in the Spellchecker

          1. Text File
            LUCENE-2608.patch
            45 kB
            Grant Ingersoll
          2. Text File
            LUCENE-2608-3x.patch
            47 kB
            Grant Ingersoll

            Issue Links

            relates to

            New Feature - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. SOLR-507 Spell Checking Improvements

            • Major - Major loss of function.
            • Resolved

              Activity

              Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
              Hide
              Permalink
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment -

              Adds the accuracy functionality to the Lucene spell checker and also adds support to Solr. For Lucene, the change is backward compatible, for Solr, it is not back compatible for those who implement their own SolrSpellChecker, as I introduced a more future proof parameter passing capability. I also added a means for per implementation parameters to be passed in. Interpretation of those entries are entirely up to the implementation.

              Show
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment - Adds the accuracy functionality to the Lucene spell checker and also adds support to Solr. For Lucene, the change is backward compatible, for Solr, it is not back compatible for those who implement their own SolrSpellChecker, as I introduced a more future proof parameter passing capability. I also added a means for per implementation parameters to be passed in. Interpretation of those entries are entirely up to the implementation.
              Hide
              Permalink
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment -

              Committed revision 987179. (Trunk)

              Show
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment - Committed revision 987179. (Trunk)
              Hide
              Permalink
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment -

              Here's a 3.x version of the patch

              Show
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment - Here's a 3.x version of the patch
              Hide
              Permalink
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment -

              Bulk close for 3.1

              Show
              gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment - Bulk close for 3.1

                People

                • Assignee:
                  gsingers Grant Ingersoll
                  Reporter:
                  gsingers Grant Ingersoll
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  0 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved:

                    Development