Uploaded image for project: 'Lucene - Core'
  1. Lucene - Core
  2. LUCENE-2602

Default merge policy should take deletions into account

        Details

        • Type: Improvement
        • Status: Closed
        • Priority: Major
        • Resolution: Fixed
        • Affects Version/s: 3.1, 4.0-ALPHA
        • Fix Version/s: 3.1, 4.0-ALPHA
        • Component/s: core/index
        • Labels:
          None
        • Lucene Fields:
          New

          Description

          LUCENE-1634 added a calibrateSizeByDeletes; we had a TODO to default this to true as of 3.0 but we missed it. I'll fix it now for 3.1 and 4.0. While this is technically a change in back-compat (for 3.x), I think it's fine to make an exception here; this should be a big win for indices that have high doc turnover with time.

            Activity

            Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
            Hide
            Permalink
            yseeley@gmail.com Yonik Seeley added a comment -

            Great - I meant to add this as a default for solr quite some time ago.
            REMINDER (to self mainly, or anyone else willing): need to verify that solr correctly picks up this default (i.e doesn't accidentally override it).
            I know there were related issues like SOLR-1444.

            Show
            yseeley@gmail.com Yonik Seeley added a comment - Great - I meant to add this as a default for solr quite some time ago. REMINDER (to self mainly, or anyone else willing): need to verify that solr correctly picks up this default (i.e doesn't accidentally override it). I know there were related issues like SOLR-1444 .
            Hide
            Permalink
            gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment -

            Bulk close for 3.1

            Show
            gsingers Grant Ingersoll added a comment - Bulk close for 3.1

              People

              • Assignee:
                mikemccand Michael McCandless
                Reporter:
                mikemccand Michael McCandless
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                0 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Development