Uploaded image for project: 'Lucene - Core'
  1. Lucene - Core
  2. LUCENE-1561

Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs

Attach filesAttach ScreenshotVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 2.4.1
    • 2.9
    • core/index
    • None
    • New

    Description

      Spinoff from here:

      http://www.nabble.com/search-problem-when-indexed-using-Field.setOmitTf()-td22456141.html

      Maybe rename omitTf to something like omitTermPositions, and make it clear what queries will silently fail to work as a result.

      Attachments

        1. LUCENE-1561.patch
          35 kB
          Michael McCandless
        2. LUCENE-1561.patch
          5 kB
          Michael McCandless

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            mikemccand Michael McCandless
            mikemccand Michael McCandless
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment