-
Type:
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Minor
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: 1.9, 2.0.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2
-
Fix Version/s: 2.4
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Lucene Fields:New
There is confusion about these current Field options and I think we
should rename them, deprecating the old names in 2.4/2.9 and removing
them in 3.0. How about this:
TOKENIZED --> ANALYZED UN_TOKENIZED --> NOT_ANALYZED NO_NORMS --> NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS
Should we also add ANALYZED_NO_NORMS?
Spinoff from here:
- is related to
-
LUCENE-4369 StringFields name is unintuitive and not helpful
-
- Open
-