Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Critical
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
2.14.0, 2.13.3
-
None
-
None
-
OS: Win10 Pro 2004 Build 19041.572
Java: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.282-b08, mixed mode)
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8550U CPU @ 1.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.0GHz
Memory: 32768MB RAM
Description
I tested out the JDBC Logger with a PoolingDriver on several RDBMS (mysql, mssql, postgre) over the newest JDBC driver and some older ones.
But all have a common problem, they dont act concurrent.
I tired out the AsyncLogger, Asyc Appender, Failover etc. but nothing it takes long to log.
Then i tried out the h2:file db and its rly fast like from 40min 30 sec in other rdbms to 20 sec in h2 ?!
Our Application creates around 600.000 Log entrys / day, and we want to improve logging by implementing log4j2 in our bigger project, but this is a nogo for the application.
I created a github repo for testing things out, flight-recorded some of the runs here:
stefanwendelmann/Log4j_JDBC_Test (github.com)
I created a Stack Overflow Question here:
sql server - Concurrency logging to sql DB - threads not running parallel - Stack Overflow