Uploaded image for project: 'Legal Discuss'
  1. Legal Discuss
  2. LEGAL-566

Clarify use of Apache naming on incompatible Apache derived licenses

VotersWatch issueWatchersLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Task
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Document
    • None

    Description

      We have seen the increase of licenses derived on the Apache license that include words that are incompatible with the original Apache license for example "Apache 2.0 with Commons Clause". LEGAL-402 made Commons Clause part of the Category X licenses so incompatible.

      We should clarify that incompatible changes in terms can no longer be called Apache license.

      Related discussion on members@ mailing list

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            iemejia Ismaël Mejía
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Issue deployment