Legal Discuss
  1. Legal Discuss
  2. LEGAL-16

Cocoon have asked about the MPL licensed FCKEditor

    Details

    • Type: Question Question
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Labels:
      None

      Issue Links

        Activity

        Hide
        Sam Ruby added a comment -

        An an optional dependency not shipped with Cocoon - seems OK.

        As something bundled w/Cocoon, I would think that the commercial licenses would give some users heartburn.

        Show
        Sam Ruby added a comment - An an optional dependency not shipped with Cocoon - seems OK. As something bundled w/Cocoon, I would think that the commercial licenses would give some users heartburn.
        Hide
        Henri Yandell added a comment -

        I don't see why the commercial license would give users heartburn (at least, I don't see those users' views being important to the ASF ).

        Generally this seems to depend on LEGAL-24being resolved before it would be allowed.

        Show
        Henri Yandell added a comment - I don't see why the commercial license would give users heartburn (at least, I don't see those users' views being important to the ASF ). Generally this seems to depend on LEGAL-24 being resolved before it would be allowed.
        Hide
        Henri Yandell added a comment -
        Show
        Henri Yandell added a comment - Original thread: http://markmail.org/message/movcwc467ob3m3hh
        Hide
        Sam Ruby added a comment -

        Commercial license terms can be found here: http://www.fckeditor.net/license

        Note prices.

        Show
        Sam Ruby added a comment - Commercial license terms can be found here: http://www.fckeditor.net/license Note prices.
        Hide
        Henri Yandell added a comment -

        Meaning that the commercial license is a good thing. If we include MPL and the user doesn't like MPL, well they have an option. The only people I saw having heartburn were those against Open Source projects having commercial terms too (which I admit to wincing at, but it's definitely a viable market.

        Show
        Henri Yandell added a comment - Meaning that the commercial license is a good thing. If we include MPL and the user doesn't like MPL, well they have an option. The only people I saw having heartburn were those against Open Source projects having commercial terms too (which I admit to wincing at, but it's definitely a viable market.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Henri Yandell
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Development