Details
Description
I have seen a few issues utilizing the default value of reserved.broker.max.id=1000 in existing clusters during upgrades. For many that started broker.ids at 0 and incremented by 1 this may not be an issue. However, others may have very different numbering schemes.
Given that we have the entire Integer range to work with, I propose we increase the default to a much larger value. This will help reduce upgrade issues and also help more clearly identify generated broker ids.
Would defaulting to 1,000,000,000 be to large? Perhaps 1,000,000 is enough.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
KAFKA-3091 Broker with an invalid id would not start when its id is updated to a new valid one
-
- Resolved
-
- relates to
-
-
- Resolved
-