Uploaded image for project: 'Jackrabbit Content Repository'
  1. Jackrabbit Content Repository
  2. JCR-2861

Internal Timeout Handling in the TransactionContext is not XA Spec. conform

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Critical
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 2.2
    • 2.2.10, 2.3
    • jackrabbit-core
    • None

    Description

      The problem here is that in a 2 phase transaction the xa spec does not
      permit a RB* return code in response to xa_commit(). The xa spec says
      the following about RB* return codes in the xa_commit() section:

      "The resource manager did not commit the work done on behalf of the
      transaction branch. Upon return, the resource manager has rolled back
      the branch?s work and has released all held resources. These values may
      be returned only if TMONEPHASE is set in flags"

      Essentially, the only two return codes from xa_commit that J2EE Containers can
      handle sensibly are XA_OK (normal case) and XA_RMFAIL. RMFAIL will
      cause the containers to retry to commit the transaction. Any other return code will result in a heuristic
      transaction outcome (non-atomic).

      In a xa environment the TMONEPHASE is not set on the flags and so XA_RBTIMEOUT is
      not a permitted return code. A Container transaction service cannot do anything to ensure an atomic
      outcome if an XAResource fails to honour its promise to be able to commit it made when it answer XA_OK in response to xa_prepare().

      The internal timeout handling will rollback the Jackrabbit XAResource if the time exceeds between prepare and commit.
      and in the commit Method will always throw a XA_RBTIMEOUT.

      We should not handle the timeout internal because this should make the container in a 2 Phase transaction.

      Attachments

        1. JCR-2861.patch
          5 kB
          Claus Köll

        Activity

          People

            c_koell Claus Köll
            c_koell Claus Köll
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: