Ivy
  1. Ivy
  2. IVY-1090

Standalone runner should accept all the same parameters as ant tasks

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Reopened
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: 2.1.0-RC1
    • Fix Version/s: 2.1.0-RC2
    • Component/s: Core
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The ant task for retrieve allows you to specify which types you want to retrieve, whereas the standalone runner does not allow this. Also the ant task provides an ivypattern parameter which is not available in the standalone runner.

        Activity

        Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
        Open Open Resolved Resolved
        1d 11h 19m 1 Maarten Coene 11/Jun/09 22:22
        Resolved Resolved Reopened Reopened
        77d 16h 13m 1 Willem Verstraeten 28/Aug/09 14:35
        Hide
        tuxedo added a comment -

        I also noticed these shortcomings of the command-line runner:

        • cannot use an IvySettings file via a url (though using <include> from a local ivysettings.xml is a workaround)
        • cannot call -retrieve without a pattern, even if $ {ivy.retrieve.pattern}

          is defined in the settings file (which is ignored)

        Show
        tuxedo added a comment - I also noticed these shortcomings of the command-line runner: cannot use an IvySettings file via a url (though using <include> from a local ivysettings.xml is a workaround) cannot call -retrieve without a pattern, even if $ {ivy.retrieve.pattern} is defined in the settings file (which is ignored)
        Willem Verstraeten made changes -
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Reopened [ 4 ]
        Hide
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment - - edited

        The command line option still seems to miss these options, which are available for the ant task:

        • revision (there actually is a revision attribute, but according to the help output of the CLI runner it is purely for the publish step, not for the resolve step ?)
        • branch
        • resolveId
        • showprogress
        • checkIfChanged
        Show
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment - - edited The command line option still seems to miss these options, which are available for the ant task: revision (there actually is a revision attribute, but according to the help output of the CLI runner it is purely for the publish step, not for the resolve step ?) branch resolveId showprogress checkIfChanged
        Maarten Coene made changes -
        Fix Version/s 2.1.0-RC2 [ 12314062 ]
        Fix Version/s trunk [ 12313426 ]
        Hide
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment -

        The new options work wonderfully, thanks

        Show
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment - The new options work wonderfully, thanks
        Hide
        Maarten Coene added a comment -

        Yes, so could you please give it a try to see if it's working in your environment.

        Show
        Maarten Coene added a comment - Yes, so could you please give it a try to see if it's working in your environment.
        Hide
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment -

        Does this mean that this fix will be included in 2.1.0 final ?

        Show
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment - Does this mean that this fix will be included in 2.1.0 final ?
        Maarten Coene made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Assignee Maarten Coene [ maartenc ]
        Fix Version/s trunk [ 12313426 ]
        Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
        Hide
        Maarten Coene added a comment -

        I've added some extra options to the resolve and retrieve CLI operations.
        Could you give it a try to see if this is enough? If not, please reopen.

        Maarten

        Show
        Maarten Coene added a comment - I've added some extra options to the resolve and retrieve CLI operations. Could you give it a try to see if this is enough? If not, please reopen. Maarten
        Hide
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment -

        Similarly the ant 'resolve' task provides more options than are available for the standalone runner. It would be nice if both approaches would be equally powerful.

        Show
        Willem Verstraeten added a comment - Similarly the ant 'resolve' task provides more options than are available for the standalone runner. It would be nice if both approaches would be equally powerful.
        Willem Verstraeten created issue -

          People

          • Assignee:
            Maarten Coene
            Reporter:
            Willem Verstraeten
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Development