Uploaded image for project: 'Causeway'
  1. Causeway
  2. CAUSEWAY-2694

Can we simplify secman and get rid of SecurityRealm / SecurityRealmCharacteristics ?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 2.0.0-M5
    • 2.0.0-M6
    • Ext Sec Secman
    • None

    Description

      There's quite a few types here (SecurityRealmService, SecurityRealm, SecurityRealmCharacteristics) along with a requirement for the end-developer to instantiate a SecurityRealmService bean... but all we do is use the value to hide/not hide an action.   

       

      Seems to be over-engineered?  Can this be simplified, or perhaps even just removed?

      Attachments

        1. image-2021-05-24-22-41-32-839.png
          52 kB
          Daniel Keir Haywood

        Activity

          People

            danhaywood Daniel Keir Haywood
            danhaywood Daniel Keir Haywood
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: