Infrastructure
  1. Infrastructure
  2. INFRA-5866

Move Apache Any23 to use Git as main source code repository

    Details

    • Type: Wish Wish
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Fix Version/s: Initial Clearing
    • Component/s: Git
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The Apache Any23 community has expressed commitment to use Git as the main source code repository.
      We would be grateful if the Infrastructure team could make the Any23 Git repository writable.
      Thank you
      Lewis

        Activity

        Hide
        David Nalley added a comment -
        SVN is RO now.

        Git repo is here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/any23.git
        It's also read-only.

        Please review, once the PPMC signs off, update this ticket and I'll make it writable.
        Show
        David Nalley added a comment - SVN is RO now. Git repo is here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/any23.git It's also read-only. Please review, once the PPMC signs off, update this ticket and I'll make it writable.
        Hide
        Peter Ansell added a comment -
        I am not familiar with the process, but there was a dev mailing list thread that was responded to by PPMC members where all of the responses indicated +1 for moving to git. Is that enough for signoff or does there need to be a [Vote] in the thread title for it to be official?

        The initial emails were [1] and [2].

        This was followed by this email that started a thread with +1's [3]

        [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/any23-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCAGaRif1tT45_yKbDeVo35e-B3%2BQdYRo56Fe%3DK_aLZeyhierhMg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
        [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/any23-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCAGYFOCRgNywdsPM7_rPC2HVp6hr8HayByBXJfCpO78ePEEkcqQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E
        [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/any23-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCAGaRif1ycSWNEZPVhmTOeWw2pv1aLmMGeb=v7=eq+UEy9hSLNQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
        Show
        Peter Ansell added a comment - I am not familiar with the process, but there was a dev mailing list thread that was responded to by PPMC members where all of the responses indicated +1 for moving to git. Is that enough for signoff or does there need to be a [Vote] in the thread title for it to be official? The initial emails were [1] and [2]. This was followed by this email that started a thread with +1's [3] [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/any23-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCAGaRif1tT45_yKbDeVo35e-B3%2BQdYRo56Fe%3DK_aLZeyhierhMg%40mail.gmail.com%3E [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/any23-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCAGYFOCRgNywdsPM7_rPC2HVp6hr8HayByBXJfCpO78ePEEkcqQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/any23-dev/201302.mbox/%3CCAGaRif1ycSWNEZPVhmTOeWw2pv1aLmMGeb=v7=eq+ UEy9hSLNQ@mail.gmail.com %3E
        Hide
        David Nalley added a comment -
        The issue is that while we have general faith in process/scripts for migration we have had occurrences where branches/tags have been missing in certain cases. So this is really that the project is satisfied that the git repo is an accurate copy of what is in SVN.

        --David
        Show
        David Nalley added a comment - The issue is that while we have general faith in process/scripts for migration we have had occurrences where branches/tags have been missing in certain cases. So this is really that the project is satisfied that the git repo is an accurate copy of what is in SVN. --David
        Hide
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment -
        I've checked the branches (which are legacy and currently not used anyway) and tags, and all looks good to me. Also the issues which have been addressed look up-to-date as of the last commit.
        @Peter, if you can confirm then I would be happy for the new repos to go writable.
        Thank you for your work guys.
        Show
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment - I've checked the branches (which are legacy and currently not used anyway) and tags, and all looks good to me. Also the issues which have been addressed look up-to-date as of the last commit. @Peter, if you can confirm then I would be happy for the new repos to go writable. Thank you for your work guys.
        Hide
        David Nalley added a comment -
        Any update on this?
        Show
        David Nalley added a comment - Any update on this?
        Hide
        #asfinfra IRC Bot added a comment -
        <danielsh> feedback timeout
        Show
        #asfinfra IRC Bot added a comment - <danielsh> feedback timeout
        Hide
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment -
        I would like to reopen this issue.
        * We are happy with the Git repos set out and content.
        * We would however like the committers module [0] also made available within the Git repos.
        * We will manage the Any23 documentation from the curent SVN directory so presumable this will need to stay writable?

        Thank you

        [0] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/any23/committers/
        Show
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment - I would like to reopen this issue. * We are happy with the Git repos set out and content. * We would however like the committers module [0] also made available within the Git repos. * We will manage the Any23 documentation from the curent SVN directory so presumable this will need to stay writable? Thank you [0] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/any23/committers/
        Hide
        David Nalley added a comment -
        Lewis:

        If I understand correctly - the any23 git repo is satisfactory and can be made writable?

        The committers module is here:
        https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/any23-committers.git

        which parts of the any23 svn tree (aside from site) are you wanting to keep writable?

        --David
        Show
        David Nalley added a comment - Lewis: If I understand correctly - the any23 git repo is satisfactory and can be made writable? The committers module is here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/any23-committers.git which parts of the any23 svn tree (aside from site) are you wanting to keep writable? --David
        Hide
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment -
        Hi David, new Git committers tree is great. New Git Any23 tree is great.
        It is just the site directory within SVN we would like to keep writable.
        Thank you so much.
        Show
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment - Hi David, new Git committers tree is great. New Git Any23 tree is great. It is just the site directory within SVN we would like to keep writable. Thank you so much.
        Hide
        David Nalley added a comment -
        Lewis:

        Both git repos are writable now.

        any23/site is writable in SVN now, the remainder remains read-only.

        Enjoy.
        Show
        David Nalley added a comment - Lewis: Both git repos are writable now. any23/site is writable in SVN now, the remainder remains read-only. Enjoy.
        Hide
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment -
        Hi David. Thank you so much for this. Your help is greatly appreciated honestly.
        Show
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment - Hi David. Thank you so much for this. Your help is greatly appreciated honestly.

          People

          • Assignee:
            David Nalley
            Reporter:
            Lewis John McGibbney
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development