Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Fix Version/s: Initial Clearing
-
Component/s: Dists
-
Labels:None
Description
hi guys. from offlist mail about a proposed-release tarball (and accompanying signatures):
> >> - The files like Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha2.r802600.tgz.md5
> >> and Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha2.r802600.tgz.sha1 are
> >> served by [people.apache.org] as 'Content-Type: application/x-gzip',
> >> and subsequently the web browsers that I tried (opera and lynx)
> >> both name the resulting file with a .gz appended, which is then
> >> very wrong - they can't be gunzipped as they are not really
> >> compressed, and need to be renamed to let 'sa-update --install'
> >> find them.
sure enough,
: 25...; HEAD http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha2.r802600.tgz.sha1
200 OK
Connection: close
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:33:57 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "7a5715-5b-470bbe23286c0"
Server: Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8e DAV/2
Content-Length: 91
Content-Type: application/x-gzip
Last-Modified: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:09:23 GMT
Client-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:34:04 GMT
Client-Peer: 140.211.11.9:80
Client-Response-Num: 1
Could someone check this out? cheers.
> >> - The files like Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha2.r802600.tgz.md5
> >> and Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha2.r802600.tgz.sha1 are
> >> served by [people.apache.org] as 'Content-Type: application/x-gzip',
> >> and subsequently the web browsers that I tried (opera and lynx)
> >> both name the resulting file with a .gz appended, which is then
> >> very wrong - they can't be gunzipped as they are not really
> >> compressed, and need to be renamed to let 'sa-update --install'
> >> find them.
sure enough,
: 25...; HEAD http://people.apache.org/~jm/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-rules-3.3.0-alpha2.r802600.tgz.sha1
200 OK
Connection: close
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:33:57 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
ETag: "7a5715-5b-470bbe23286c0"
Server: Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.11 OpenSSL/0.9.8e DAV/2
Content-Length: 91
Content-Type: application/x-gzip
Last-Modified: Sun, 09 Aug 2009 21:09:23 GMT
Client-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:34:04 GMT
Client-Peer: 140.211.11.9:80
Client-Response-Num: 1
Could someone check this out? cheers.
Activity
Btw, the test case has changed meanwhile:
HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.0-rc1.proposed2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-rc1.proposed2.tar.bz2.md5
HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.0-rc1.proposed2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-rc1.proposed2.tar.bz2.sha1
but the result is still the incorrect:
Content-Type: application/x-bzip2
Any chance of adding these two AddType lines to the httpd config file on minotaur?
HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.0-rc1.proposed2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-rc1.proposed2.tar.bz2.md5
HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.0-rc1.proposed2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-rc1.proposed2.tar.bz2.sha1
but the result is still the incorrect:
Content-Type: application/x-bzip2
Any chance of adding these two AddType lines to the httpd config file on minotaur?
Show
Mark Martinec
added a comment - Btw, the test case has changed meanwhile:
HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.0-rc1.proposed2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-rc1.proposed2.tar.bz2.md5
HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/3.3.0-rc1.proposed2/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-rc1.proposed2.tar.bz2.sha1
but the result is still the incorrect:
Content-Type: application/x-bzip2
Any chance of adding these two AddType lines to the httpd config file on minotaur?
Can you not put the AddType line in /home/wtogami/public_html/devel/.htaccess?
AddType text/plain .asc .md5 .sha1
AddType text/plain .asc .md5 .sha1
Show
Todd Volkert
added a comment - Can you not put the AddType line in /home/wtogami/public_html/devel/.htaccess?
AddType text/plain .asc .md5 .sha1
> Can you not put the AddType line in /home/wtogami/public_html/devel/.htaccess?
I prefer general solutions that solve a problem for all users / for future cases too,
but I guess we can live with an ad-hoc fix. Thanks.
I prefer general solutions that solve a problem for all users / for future cases too,
but I guess we can live with an ad-hoc fix. Thanks.
Show
Mark Martinec
added a comment - > Can you not put the AddType line in /home/wtogami/public_html/devel/.htaccess?
I prefer general solutions that solve a problem for all users / for future cases too,
but I guess we can live with an ad-hoc fix. Thanks.
Agreed that solutions that help all are desirable. The attached patch might do the trick.
Show
Todd Volkert
added a comment - Agreed that solutions that help all are desirable. The attached patch might do the trick.
<pgollucci> done
Show
#asfinfra IRC Bot
added a comment - <pgollucci> done
Thanks for fixing the mime type on .md5 and .sha1 !
As for .asc, this was not incorrect previously, it was returning application/pgp-signature
if I remember correctly. While text/plain is not strictly incorrect, I think the .asc
should be better left as it was.
As for .asc, this was not incorrect previously, it was returning application/pgp-signature
if I remember correctly. While text/plain is not strictly incorrect, I think the .asc
should be better left as it was.
Show
Mark Martinec
added a comment - Thanks for fixing the mime type on .md5 and .sha1 !
As for .asc, this was not incorrect previously, it was returning application/pgp-signature
if I remember correctly. While text/plain is not strictly incorrect, I think the .asc
should be better left as it was.
<pgollucci> .asc reverted
Show
#asfinfra IRC Bot
added a comment - <pgollucci> .asc reverted
$ HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-beta1.tar.gz.md5
200 OK
[...]
Content-Type: application/x-gzip
$ HEAD http://people.apache.org/~wtogami/devel/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0-beta1.tar.gz.sha1
200 OK
[...]
Content-Type: application/x-gzip
Files ending in .md5 or .sha1 SHOULD NOT have a Content-Type of application/x-gzip (inherited
from a 'gz' in the middle of their names). I'm not sure what is the most appropriate MIME type
for ascii digest files, but something like text/plain would be just fine (or perhaps text/x-hash or
application/x-signature).
Adding something like the following to the httpd configuration helps:
AddType text/plain .md5
AddType text/plain .sha1