[IMPALA-2529] old agg/join failure: test_exprs incorrect results

• Type: Bug
• Status: Resolved
• Priority: Blocker
• Resolution: Fixed
• Affects Version/s: Impala 2.3.0
• Fix Version/s: Impala 2.3.0
• Labels: correctness
• Target Version: Impala 2.3.0
• Assignee: Matthew Jacobs
• Reporter: Daniel Hecht
• Created: 10/Oct/15 16:19
• Updated: 11/Oct/15 01:15
• Resolved: 11/Oct/15 01:15

Description

http://sandbox.jenkins.cloudera.com/view/Impala/view/Builds%20-%202.3.0%20Release/job/impala-cdh5.5.x-non-partitioned-hash-and-aggs/33/testReport/junit/query_test.test_queries/TestQueries/test_exprs_exec_option____disable_codegen___False___abort_on_error___1___exec_single_node_rows_threshold___0___batch_size___0___num_nodes___0____table_format__parquet_none_/

-- executing against localhost:21000
select count(id) from functional.alltypestiny t1
left join (select coalesce(1, 10) as int_col
from functional.alltypessmall) t2 on t1.id = t2.int_col
where t2.int_col in (t2.int_col, 10);

MainThread: Comparing QueryTestResults (expected vs actual):
100 != 0

This job had been passing, so it looks like it may be a regression. new changes in this run:

IMPALA-2474: PlannerTest fails due to nested types file size mismatch (detail)
IMPALA-2265: Sorter was not checking the returned Status of PrepareRead (detail)
IMPALA-2378: check proc mem limit before preparing fragment (detail)
IMPALA-2517: bad buffer/block mapping in BufferedBlockMgr (detail)
IMPALA-2445: Preserve chain of table refs until end of computeParentAndSubplanRefs(). (detail)
IMPALA-2495: make Expr::IsConstant() recurse on children (detail)
Fix expected locality of parquet column ranges. (detail)
IMPALA-2484: make array allocation failure test less flaky (detail)
IMPALA-2514: DCHECK on destroying an ExprContext (detail)
IMPALA-2510: Temp fix for failed TestHdfsCachingDdl test (detail)
IMPALA-2512: skip TestRewrittenFile.test_new_file_shorter on S3 (detail)
Update the Avro scanner bad version header error message to include the file. (detail)

mjacobs, could you take a look please?