Description
Suppose we have a cache, with 1000 entries, one backup and eviction after 500 entries. Then, off-heap entries are doubled in visorcmd, while on-heap entries are not:
+-----------------------------------------------------+ | Name(@) | EmployeesCache(@c0) | | Nodes | 2 | | Total size Min/Avg/Max | 1500 / 1500.00 / 1500 | | Heap size Min/Avg/Max | 500 / 500.00 / 500 | | Off-heap size Min/Avg/Max | 1000 / 1000.00 / 1000 | +-----------------------------------------------------+ Nodes for: EmployeesCache(@c0) +=============================================================================================================+ | Node ID8(@), IP | CPUs | Heap Used | CPU Load | Up Time | Size | Hi/Mi/Rd/Wr | +=============================================================================================================+ | 37333BC6(@n0), 172.16.9.1 | 8 | 4.47 % | 0.40 % | 00:00:47:154 | Total: 1500 | Hi: 0 | | | | | | | Heap: 500 | Mi: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap: 1000 | Rd: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap Memory: 0 | Wr: 0 | +---------------------------+------+-----------+----------+--------------+----------------------+-------------+ | 26FD4343(@n1), 172.16.9.1 | 8 | 3.09 % | 0.23 % | 00:00:41:602 | Total: 1500 | Hi: 0 | | | | | | | Heap: 500 | Mi: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap: 1000 | Rd: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap Memory: 0 | Wr: 0 | +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ 'Hi' - Number of cache hits.
By contrast, on 1.9 it looks like this:
Cache 'EmployeesCache(@c0)': +-----------------------------------------------------+ | Name(@) | EmployeesCache(@c0) | | Nodes | 2 | | Total size Min/Avg/Max | 1000 / 1000.00 / 1000 | | Heap size Min/Avg/Max | 500 / 500.00 / 500 | | Off-heap size Min/Avg/Max | 500 / 500.00 / 500 | +-----------------------------------------------------+ Nodes for: EmployeesCache(@c0) +================================================================================================================+ | Node ID8(@), IP | CPUs | Heap Used | CPU Load | Up Time | Size | Hi/Mi/Rd/Wr | +================================================================================================================+ | 3229FABE(@n0), 172.16.9.1 | 8 | 1.25 % | 0.23 % | 00:00:43:111 | Total: 1000 | Hi: 0 | | | | | | | Heap: 500 | Mi: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap: 500 | Rd: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap Memory: 88kb | Wr: 0 | +---------------------------+------+-----------+----------+--------------+-------------------------+-------------+ | 58FA742B(@n1), 172.16.9.1 | 8 | 1.15 % | 0.47 % | 00:00:38:828 | Total: 1000 | Hi: 0 | | | | | | | Heap: 500 | Mi: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap: 500 | Rd: 0 | | | | | | | Off-Heap Memory: 88kb | Wr: 0 | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
NB: It might be feasible to keep number of backup entries displayed in visorcmd, but without adding them up with primary entries. Another dedicated line perhaps? Should also probably be consistent with other memory kinds.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
IGNITE-6131 In visorcmd "cache on nodes" statistics doubles off-heap entries
-
- Closed
-