Uploaded image for project: 'Hive'
  1. Hive
  2. HIVE-12285

Add locking to HCatClient

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Release Note:
      HCatClient operations may now participate with locks.

      Description

      With the introduction of a concurrency model (HIVE-1293) Hive uses locks to coordinate access and updates to both table data and metadata. Within the Hive CLI such lock management is seamless. However, Hive provides additional APIs that permit interaction with data repositories, namely the HCatalog APIs. Currently, operations implemented by this API do not participate with Hive's locking scheme. Furthermore, access to the locking mechanisms is not exposed by the APIs (as is the case with the Metastore Thrift API) and so users are not able to explicitly interact with locks either. This has created a less than ideal situation where users of the APIs have no choice but to manipulate these data repositories outside of the command of Hive's lock management, potentially resulting in situations where data inconsistencies can occur both for external processes using the API and for queries executing within Hive.

      Scope of work

      This ticket is concerned with sections of the HCatalog API that deal with DDL type operations using the metastore, not with those whose purpose is to read/write table data. A separate issue already exists for adding locking to HCat readers and writers (HIVE-6207).

      Proposed work

      The following work items would serve as a minimum deliverable that would both allow API users to effectively work with locks:

      • Comprehensively document on the wiki the locks required for various Hive operations. At a minimum this should cover all operations exposed by HCatClient. The Locking design document can be used as a starting point or perhaps updated.
      • Implement methods and types in the HCatClient API that allow users to manipulate Hive locks. For the most part I'd expect these to delegate to the metastore API implementations:
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.IMetaStoreClient.lock(LockRequest)
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.IMetaStoreClient.checkLock(long)
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.IMetaStoreClient.unlock(long)
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.IMetaStoreClient.showLocks()
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.IMetaStoreClient.heartbeat(long, long)
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.LockComponent
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.LockRequest
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.LockResponse
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.LockLevel
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.LockType
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.LockState
        • org.apache.hadoop.hive.metastore.api.ShowLocksResponse

      Additional proposals

      Explicit lock management should be fairly simple to add to HCatClient, however it puts the onus on the API user to correctly understand and implement code that uses lock in an appropriate manner. Failure to do so may have undesirable consequences. With a simpler user model the operations exposed on the API would automatically acquire and release the locks that they need. This might work well for small numbers of operations, but not perhaps for large sequences of invocations. (Do we need to worry about this though as the API methods usually accept batches?). Additionally tasks such as heartbeat management could also be handled implicitly for long running sets of operations. With these concerns in mind it may also be beneficial to deliver some of the following:

      • A means to automatically acquire/release appropriate locks for HCatClient operations.
      • A component that maintains a lock heartbeat from the client.
      • A strategy for switching between manual/automatic lock management, analogous to SQL's autocommit for transactions.

      An API for lock and heartbeat management already exists in the HCatalog Mutation API (see: org.apache.hive.hcatalog.streaming.mutate.client.lock). It will likely make sense to refactor either this code and/or code that uses it.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                teabot Elliot West
                Reporter:
                teabot Elliot West
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                9 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated: