[HDDS-4420] Missing a container shouldn't log message at ERROR level

• Type: Improvement
• Status: Resolved
• Priority: Trivial
• Resolution: Fixed
• Affects Version/s: 1.0.0
• Fix Version/s: 1.1.0
• Component/s: SCM
• Labels: pull-request-available
• Assignee: YI-CHEN WANG
• Reporter: Wei-Chiu Chuang
• Created: 02/Nov/20 20:26
• Updated: 10/Nov/20 14:40
• Resolved: 10/Nov/20 14:39

Description

Missing a container replica should be a WARN level log at most.

2020-11-02 11:54:06,217 ERROR org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.IncrementalContainerReportHandler: Exception while processing ICR for container 169498
org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.ContainerReplicaNotFoundException: Container #169498, replica: ContainerReplica{containerID=#169498, datanodeDetails=d2371c12-90b8-4ee8-a76f-c1e57a61509c{ip: 10.17.221.16, host: vc1506.halxg.cloudera.com, networkLocation: /default, certSerialId: null}, placeOfBirth=d2371c12-90b8-4ee8-a76f-c1e57a61509c, sequenceId=0, keyCount=100, bytesUsed=30720000}
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.states.ContainerStateMap.removeContainerReplica(ContainerStateMap.java:256)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.ContainerStateManager.removeContainerReplica(ContainerStateManager.java:538)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.SCMContainerManager.removeContainerReplica(SCMContainerManager.java:565)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.AbstractContainerReportHandler.updateContainerReplica(AbstractContainerReportHandler.java:272)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.AbstractContainerReportHandler.processContainerReplica(AbstractContainerReportHandler.java:85)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.IncrementalContainerReportHandler.onMessage(IncrementalContainerReportHandler.java:80)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.scm.container.IncrementalContainerReportHandler.onMessage(IncrementalContainerReportHandler.java:38)
        at org.apache.hadoop.hdds.server.events.SingleThreadExecutor.lambda$onMessage$1(SingleThreadExecutor.java:81)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)

Issue Links

• links to: GitHub Pull Request #1554