Details

    • Type: Sub-task Sub-task
    • Status: Patch Available
    • Priority: Minor Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: 0.94.0
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: mapreduce
    • Labels:
      None

      Activity

      Hide
      Hadoop QA added a comment -

      -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
      http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12546927/TestCopyTable_HBASE_5059.patch
      against trunk revision .

      +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

      +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests.

      -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.

      Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2954//console

      This message is automatically generated.

      Show
      Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12546927/TestCopyTable_HBASE_5059.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2954//console This message is automatically generated.
      Hide
      stack added a comment -

      Retrying against hadoopqa. Moving out of 0.96 too... unless you figure a fix for the broke test Evan (thanks).

      Show
      stack added a comment - Retrying against hadoopqa. Moving out of 0.96 too... unless you figure a fix for the broke test Evan (thanks).
      Hide
      stack added a comment -

      Retry

      Show
      stack added a comment - Retry
      Hide
      Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

      Moving to 0.96 for now.

      Show
      Lars Hofhansl added a comment - Moving to 0.96 for now.
      Hide
      stack added a comment -

      @Evan If you poke around, you can find the logs of your test run up on the apache build server. If you run the test local, does it pass? To retry your patch against hadoopqa, hit 'cancel patch' above and then reattach and then hit 'submit patch' again. See if you patch fails second or third time; if it does, add debug to your patch to help figure whats going on? Thanks.

      Show
      stack added a comment - @Evan If you poke around, you can find the logs of your test run up on the apache build server. If you run the test local, does it pass? To retry your patch against hadoopqa, hit 'cancel patch' above and then reattach and then hit 'submit patch' again. See if you patch fails second or third time; if it does, add debug to your patch to help figure whats going on? Thanks.
      Hide
      stack added a comment -

      @Evan If you poke around, you can find the logs of your test run up on the apache build server. If you run the test local, does it pass? To retry your patch against hadoopqa, hit 'cancel patch' above and then reattach and then hit 'submit patch' again. See if you patch fails second or third time; if it does, add debug to your patch to help figure whats going on? Thanks.

      Show
      stack added a comment - @Evan If you poke around, you can find the logs of your test run up on the apache build server. If you run the test local, does it pass? To retry your patch against hadoopqa, hit 'cancel patch' above and then reattach and then hit 'submit patch' again. See if you patch fails second or third time; if it does, add debug to your patch to help figure whats going on? Thanks.
      Hide
      Evan Beard added a comment -

      I agree haha. My tests are passing locally – is there a way I can replicate the environment of the CI server so this problem is easier to debug? I noticed the failures are at my assertion that the CopyTable job succeeded, but there's not much that helps me further diagnose this in the test logs.

      Show
      Evan Beard added a comment - I agree haha. My tests are passing locally – is there a way I can replicate the environment of the CI server so this problem is easier to debug? I noticed the failures are at my assertion that the CopyTable job succeeded, but there's not much that helps me further diagnose this in the test logs.
      Hide
      Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

      Thanks Evan.
      The TestCopyTable failures are suspicious

      Show
      Lars Hofhansl added a comment - Thanks Evan. The TestCopyTable failures are suspicious
      Hide
      Hadoop QA added a comment -

      -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
      http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12516699/TestCopyTable_HBASE_5059.patch
      against trunk revision .

      +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

      +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests.

      -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated -131 warning messages.

      +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

      -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 155 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

      +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

      -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests:
      org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestCopyTable
      org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestServerCustomProtocol
      org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv
      org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapred.TestTableMapReduce
      org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestHFileOutputFormat

      Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1069//testReport/
      Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1069//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
      Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1069//console

      This message is automatically generated.

      Show
      Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12516699/TestCopyTable_HBASE_5059.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 2 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated -131 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 155 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestCopyTable org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestServerCustomProtocol org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestImportTsv org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapred.TestTableMapReduce org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestHFileOutputFormat Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1069//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1069//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1069//console This message is automatically generated.
      Hide
      Evan Beard added a comment -

      hey Jesse, thanks, reattaching patch

      Show
      Evan Beard added a comment - hey Jesse, thanks, reattaching patch
      Hide
      Jesse Yates added a comment -

      HadoopQA works against the svn branch. You need to use: 'git diff --no-prefix'

      Show
      Jesse Yates added a comment - HadoopQA works against the svn branch. You need to use: 'git diff --no-prefix'
      Hide
      Evan Beard added a comment -

      I'm a little confused about why my patch didn't apply cleanly, would
      someone mind taking a look and letting me know what I'm doing wrong?
      It seems to manually apply against the latest trunk branch here:
      https://github.com/apache/hbase

      On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)


      Sent via mobile device

      Show
      Evan Beard added a comment - I'm a little confused about why my patch didn't apply cleanly, would someone mind taking a look and letting me know what I'm doing wrong? It seems to manually apply against the latest trunk branch here: https://github.com/apache/hbase On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA) – Sent via mobile device
      Hide
      Hadoop QA added a comment -

      -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
      http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12516692/0001-Added-tests-for-CopyTable.java.patch
      against trunk revision .

      +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

      +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests.

      -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.

      Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1068//console

      This message is automatically generated.

      Show
      Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12516692/0001-Added-tests-for-CopyTable.java.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/1068//console This message is automatically generated.
      Hide
      Evan Beard added a comment -

      Let me know if I should make changes to the attached

      Show
      Evan Beard added a comment - Let me know if I should make changes to the attached
      Hide
      Evan Beard added a comment -

      I will

      On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Lars Hofhansl (Commented) (JIRA)


      Sent via mobile device

      Show
      Evan Beard added a comment - I will On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Lars Hofhansl (Commented) (JIRA) – Sent via mobile device
      Hide
      Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

      Evan, are you still going to work on this one? Or should I reassign?

      Show
      Lars Hofhansl added a comment - Evan, are you still going to work on this one? Or should I reassign?

        People

        • Assignee:
          Evan Beard
          Reporter:
          Lars Hofhansl
        • Votes:
          0 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          4 Start watching this issue

          Dates

          • Created:
            Updated:

            Development