Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Blocker Blocker
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: Client, regionserver
    • Labels:
    • Tags:
      noob

      Description

      A super task to track the progress of porting 89-fb functionality & fixes to trunk. Note that these tasks are focused on RegionServer functionality. 89-specific master functionality doesn't have a time frame for porting.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Andrew Purtell added a comment -

          What now?

          Show
          Andrew Purtell added a comment - What now?
          Hide
          Ted Yu added a comment -

          Thanks for picking the ones that should be ported.

          I will work on some of them next week.

          Show
          Ted Yu added a comment - Thanks for picking the ones that should be ported. I will work on some of them next week.
          Hide
          stack added a comment -

          I did a pass through 0.89-fb and picked out stuff that I think fit for 0.96.0. Will work on forward porting them to trunk. So moving this out of 0.96.0.

          There looks to be loads of great stuff still to forward port or at least worth evaluating to see if it makes sense forward porting. So will leave this issue open. Going to mark it noob so if anyone wants to take on this task or even just do an issue or two from this task.

          Show
          stack added a comment - I did a pass through 0.89-fb and picked out stuff that I think fit for 0.96.0. Will work on forward porting them to trunk. So moving this out of 0.96.0. There looks to be loads of great stuff still to forward port or at least worth evaluating to see if it makes sense forward porting. So will leave this issue open. Going to mark it noob so if anyone wants to take on this task or even just do an issue or two from this task.
          Hide
          Ted Yu added a comment -

          Out of the 14 tasks, only two have been completed.
          It would be nice to prioritize the remaining 12 tasks so that we can prepare for 0.96 RC0

          Show
          Ted Yu added a comment - Out of the 14 tasks, only two have been completed. It would be nice to prioritize the remaining 12 tasks so that we can prepare for 0.96 RC0
          Hide
          stack added a comment -

          Making blocker on 0.96.0 at Nicolas's suggestion. Also made the suggested 0.94.0 blockers (Kick them out Lars if they don't align w/ what you want in 0.94.0).

          Show
          stack added a comment - Making blocker on 0.96.0 at Nicolas's suggestion. Also made the suggested 0.94.0 blockers (Kick them out Lars if they don't align w/ what you want in 0.94.0).
          Hide
          Nicolas Spiegelberg added a comment -

          I think something that we should consider as a blocker for 0.96 is explicit region placement & data locality checking for the new master.

          Show
          Nicolas Spiegelberg added a comment - I think something that we should consider as a blocker for 0.96 is explicit region placement & data locality checking for the new master.
          Hide
          Nicolas Spiegelberg added a comment -

          @stack: I'd make it a blocker for 0.96 or 1.0. I'd say the ones to mark blocker are HBASE-3967, HBASE-3776, and maybe HBASE-4914. We're actually pretty far along on this task. A lot of the other jiras are either bug fixes (which we can put in post-release, if necessary) or utilities (which shouldn't destabilize nor prevent the release).

          Show
          Nicolas Spiegelberg added a comment - @stack: I'd make it a blocker for 0.96 or 1.0. I'd say the ones to mark blocker are HBASE-3967 , HBASE-3776 , and maybe HBASE-4914 . We're actually pretty far along on this task. A lot of the other jiras are either bug fixes (which we can put in post-release, if necessary) or utilities (which shouldn't destabilize nor prevent the release).
          Hide
          stack added a comment -

          Making this a blocker on 0.94 (undo it if you think otherwise Lars – making it blocker so we don't forget it... we can punt later if it doesn't make sense).

          Show
          stack added a comment - Making this a blocker on 0.94 (undo it if you think otherwise Lars – making it blocker so we don't forget it... we can punt later if it doesn't make sense).
          Hide
          Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

          What parts of this should go into 0.94?

          Show
          Lars Hofhansl added a comment - What parts of this should go into 0.94?
          Hide
          Nicolas Spiegelberg added a comment -

          HBASE-4618 is also necessary, but is already an umbrella task

          Show
          Nicolas Spiegelberg added a comment - HBASE-4618 is also necessary, but is already an umbrella task

            People

            • Assignee:
              Nicolas Spiegelberg
              Reporter:
              Nicolas Spiegelberg
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:

                Development