Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
Do we need a server-side and client-side version of KeyValue?
One of the lads here was trying to write client-side code and got put off by javadoc that said "do not use this" (he wanted to getValue and didn't know ahead of time what columns the Result contained). This would seem to say we need javadoc for server-side and then different javadoc for client-side.
Holstad wants KV to be comparable. We can't make KV comparable because at least on server-side, comparator to use changes with context. If there was a server-side KV, then we could make that comparable and leave the server-side KV alone.