Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-11620

Record the class name of Writer in WAL header so that only proper Reader can open the WAL file

VotersStop watchingWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Critical
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 0.98.4
    • 0.99.0, 0.98.5
    • None
    • None
    • Reviewed

    Description

      Reported by Kiran in this thread: "HBase file encryption, inconsistencies observed and data loss"

      After step 4 ( i.e disabling of WAL encryption, removing SecureProtobufReader/Writer and restart), read of encrypted WAL fails mainly due to EOF exception at Basedecoder. This is not considered as error and these WAL are being moved to /oldWALs.

      Following is observed in log files:

      2014-07-30 19:44:29,254 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] wal.HLogSplitter: Splitting hlog: hdfs://HOST-16:18020/hbase/WALs/HOST-16,15264,1406725441997-splitting/HOST-16%2C15264%2C1406725441997.1406725444017, length=172
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,254 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] wal.HLogSplitter: DistributedLogReplay = false
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,313 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] util.FSHDFSUtils: Recovering lease on dfs file hdfs://HOST-16:18020/hbase/WALs/HOST-16,15264,1406725441997-splitting/HOST-16%2C15264%2C1406725441997.1406725444017
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,315 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] util.FSHDFSUtils: recoverLease=true, attempt=0 on file=hdfs://HOST-16:18020/hbase/WALs/HOST-16,15264,1406725441997-splitting/HOST-16%2C15264%2C1406725441997.1406725444017 after 1ms
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,429 DEBUG [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1-Writer-0] wal.HLogSplitter: Writer thread Thread[RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1-Writer-0,5,main]: starting
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,429 DEBUG [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1-Writer-1] wal.HLogSplitter: Writer thread Thread[RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1-Writer-1,5,main]: starting
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,430 DEBUG [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1-Writer-2] wal.HLogSplitter: Writer thread Thread[RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1-Writer-2,5,main]: starting
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,591 ERROR [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] codec.BaseDecoder: Partial cell read caused by EOF: java.io.IOException: Premature EOF from inputStream
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,592 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] wal.HLogSplitter: Finishing writing output logs and closing down.
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,592 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] wal.HLogSplitter: Waiting for split writer threads to finish
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,592 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] wal.HLogSplitter: Split writers finished
      2014-07-30 19:44:29,592 INFO  [RS_LOG_REPLAY_OPS-HOST-16:15264-1] wal.HLogSplitter: Processed 0 edits across 0 regions; log file=hdfs://HOST-16:18020/hbase/WALs/HOST-16,15264,1406725441997-splitting/HOST-16%2C15264%2C1406725441997.1406725444017 is corrupted = false progress failed = false
      

      To fix this, we need to propagate EOF exception to HLogSplitter. Any suggestions on the fix?

      -------- (end of quote from Kiran)

      In BaseDecoder#rethrowEofException() :

          if (!isEof) throw ioEx;
          LOG.error("Partial cell read caused by EOF: " + ioEx);
          EOFException eofEx = new EOFException("Partial cell read");
          eofEx.initCause(ioEx);
          throw eofEx;
      

      throwing EOFException would not propagate the "Partial cell read" condition to HLogSplitter which doesn't treat EOFException as an error.

      I think IOException should be thrown above - HLogSplitter#getNextLogLine() would translate the IOEx to CorruptedLogFileException.

      Attachments

        1. 11620-v1.txt
          0.8 kB
          Ted Yu
        2. 11620-v2.txt
          20 kB
          Ted Yu
        3. 11620-v3.txt
          25 kB
          Ted Yu
        4. 11620-v4.txt
          26 kB
          Ted Yu
        5. 11620-v5.txt
          27 kB
          Ted Yu
        6. 11620-v6.txt
          30 kB
          Ted Yu
        7. 11620-v6.txt
          30 kB
          Ted Yu
        8. 11620-0.98-v6.txt
          29 kB
          Ted Yu
        9. 11620-v7.txt
          30 kB
          Ted Yu
        10. 11620-0.98-v7.txt
          29 kB
          Ted Yu

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu
            yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            8 Stop watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment