Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-10421

Investigate scan performance in 0.96 and later

VotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Not A Problem
    • 0.98.0
    • None
    • None
    • None

    Description

      Testing the "internal friction" of scanning in HBase (all data in the block cache, and all rows filtered at the server by a ValueFilter, so that one really measures the work HBase does internally), I found that 0.98 is almost 35% slower than 0.94.

      Scanning 50m rows (one col each, 8 byte keys, 8 byte values) takes 13.2 in 0.94.17-SNAPSHOT and 18.5s in 0.98.

      This probably came about with all the protobuf changes in 0.96.
      It should be possible to bring back to par with 0.94.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            larsh Lars Hofhansl
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            9 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment