Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Remove the objects and code only needed for supporting migration to 0.96 from 0.94.

        Activity

        Hide
        lhofhansl Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

        Are we saying one can only upgrade from 0.94 to 0.96 (but not to 0.98+)?

        Show
        lhofhansl Lars Hofhansl added a comment - Are we saying one can only upgrade from 0.94 to 0.96 (but not to 0.98+)?
        Hide
        apurtell Andrew Purtell added a comment -

        Previously we have upgraded users through each major release, but yeah with 0.98 coming quickly after 0.96 I can see a direct migration from 0.94 to 0.98 being convenient. I have no strong opinion either way. How long do we keep migration support for 0.94?

        Show
        apurtell Andrew Purtell added a comment - Previously we have upgraded users through each major release, but yeah with 0.98 coming quickly after 0.96 I can see a direct migration from 0.94 to 0.98 being convenient. I have no strong opinion either way. How long do we keep migration support for 0.94?
        Hide
        lhofhansl Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

        With the Apache hat on, I think we want to foster upgrading to new version.
        With the Salesforce hat on, we plan to upgrade from 0.94 to a 1.x version in 2014.

        If the upgrade code is (1) not getting in the way or (2) hard to maintain, I'd vote to keep it in at least until one of these becomes true.

        Show
        lhofhansl Lars Hofhansl added a comment - With the Apache hat on, I think we want to foster upgrading to new version. With the Salesforce hat on, we plan to upgrade from 0.94 to a 1.x version in 2014. If the upgrade code is (1) not getting in the way or (2) hard to maintain, I'd vote to keep it in at least until one of these becomes true.
        Hide
        enis Enis Soztutar added a comment -

        I would prefer to keep the option of 0.94 -> 0.98 available, which would ease out the user's burden. 0.96 and 0.98 code bases are not that different, so keeping that in makes managing the patches easier as well I think.

        Show
        enis Enis Soztutar added a comment - I would prefer to keep the option of 0.94 -> 0.98 available, which would ease out the user's burden. 0.96 and 0.98 code bases are not that different, so keeping that in makes managing the patches easier as well I think.
        Hide
        v.himanshu Himanshu Vashishtha added a comment -

        Yeah, I agree with keeping this code in 0.98 as it is getting released so soon after 0.96.0.
        Otherwise, it will add one extra step for users who wish to upgrade from 0.94 to 0.98.

        Show
        v.himanshu Himanshu Vashishtha added a comment - Yeah, I agree with keeping this code in 0.98 as it is getting released so soon after 0.96.0. Otherwise, it will add one extra step for users who wish to upgrade from 0.94 to 0.98.
        Hide
        apurtell Andrew Purtell added a comment -

        Ok, unscheduled from 0.98

        Show
        apurtell Andrew Purtell added a comment - Ok, unscheduled from 0.98
        Hide
        jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment -

        Late, but I agree with others. Always easier to keep the upgrade options to late comer. I agree that since the releases are close to each others, some might want to skip some of them...

        Show
        jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - Late, but I agree with others. Always easier to keep the upgrade options to late comer. I agree that since the releases are close to each others, some might want to skip some of them...
        Hide
        enis Enis Soztutar added a comment -

        See HBASE-11915. Scheduling this for 2.0.

        Show
        enis Enis Soztutar added a comment - See HBASE-11915 . Scheduling this for 2.0.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            apurtell Andrew Purtell
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Development