Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Open
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Jackson for JSON is such a steaming pile of nonsense. How it became so popular in the Java community is beyond me.</p>— Graeme Rocher (@graemerocher) <a href="https://twitter.com/graemerocher/statuses/431734261939699712">February 7, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
RH: Ability to pass properties to ignore. What else? Custom serializers?
GR: yeah that was my main gripe. Should be easy to exclude properties by name
This seems like an easy feature to add. It would be for reading and serializing.
Attachments
Issue Links
- links to