Apache Gora
  1. Apache Gora
  2. GORA-118

implementation of a store.multiput(array of puts) for gora-hbase

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: 0.2
    • Fix Version/s: 0.3
    • Component/s: None
    • Environment:
      gora-hbase

      Description

      implement a multiput function around the existing put function that flushes at the end.

        Activity

        raf shin created issue -
        Hide
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment -

        Set and classify

        Show
        Lewis John McGibbney added a comment - Set and classify
        Lewis John McGibbney made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Fix Version/s 0.3 [ 12317954 ]
        Affects Version/s 0.2 [ 12315541 ]
        Hide
        Ferdy Galema added a comment -

        Is this not simply achieved by setting flush/buffersize hints to the store? For example if you set autoflush to false and possibly increase the flush buffersize then you effectively already have a multiput, no?

        Show
        Ferdy Galema added a comment - Is this not simply achieved by setting flush/buffersize hints to the store? For example if you set autoflush to false and possibly increase the flush buffersize then you effectively already have a multiput, no?
        Hide
        raf shin added a comment -

        Yes, I had not checked the autoflush/buffersize option. Thank you

        Show
        raf shin added a comment - Yes, I had not checked the autoflush/buffersize option. Thank you
        Hide
        Ferdy Galema added a comment -

        Ok. Please note that deletes are currently still pretty inefficient to process. (Deletes are always processed immediately regardless of autoflush. After I had done some tests with the HTable supported batch deletes, this seem to be slow too). It's something to keep in mind. HBASE-3584 will probably fix this.

        Show
        Ferdy Galema added a comment - Ok. Please note that deletes are currently still pretty inefficient to process. (Deletes are always processed immediately regardless of autoflush. After I had done some tests with the HTable supported batch deletes, this seem to be slow too). It's something to keep in mind. HBASE-3584 will probably fix this.
        Ferdy Galema made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Won't Fix [ 2 ]
        Lewis John McGibbney made changes -
        Status Resolved [ 5 ] Closed [ 6 ]
        Gavin made changes -
        Workflow jira [ 12662464 ] no-reopen-closed, patch-avail [ 12735260 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            raf shin
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development