Apache Drill
  1. Apache Drill
  2. DRILL-641

Better semantic and handling for kill()

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: Future
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Currently when an operator invokes kill(), only the upstream operators within that fragment get terminated. This causes problems if the upstream operator in a different fragment is still continuously producing batches, and it then becomes the responsibility of the operator to drain all the batches even though a kill was issued.

      While dealing with plans with multiple fragments we would need to inform the sender that a kill has been invoked. It would then be the responsibility of the sender to not push any more batches to the corresponding receiver.

        Activity

        Mehant Baid created issue -
        Jake Farrell made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Workflow no-reopen-closed, patch-avail [ 12859872 ] no-reopen-closed, patch-avail, testing [ 12860203 ]
        Jacques Nadeau made changes -
        Fix Version/s Future [ 12326743 ]
        Tony Stevenson made changes -
        Workflow no-reopen-closed, patch-avail, testing [ 12860203 ] Drill workflow [ 12933868 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Mehant Baid
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:

              Development