Uploaded image for project: 'Apache Drill'
  1. Apache Drill
  2. DRILL-641

Better semantic and handling for kill()

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: Future
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Currently when an operator invokes kill(), only the upstream operators within that fragment get terminated. This causes problems if the upstream operator in a different fragment is still continuously producing batches, and it then becomes the responsibility of the operator to drain all the batches even though a kill was issued.

      While dealing with plans with multiple fragments we would need to inform the sender that a kill has been invoked. It would then be the responsibility of the sender to not push any more batches to the corresponding receiver.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              mehant Mehant Baid
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: