Major Description
Relates to DIRMINA-823, where these methods were first introduced.
All the "indexed" putUnsignedXXX() methods disregard the index when writing to the underlying buffer.
For example:
public final IoBuffer putUnsignedInt(int index, byte value)
{ autoExpand(index, 4); buf().putInt( (int)((short)value&0x00ff) ); // --------------- ^^^^ --- should pass 'index' in as the first parameter return this; }The test cases in Mina core, attached to revision 1090588, do not catch this because although they use indexed puts, they use unindexed gets (had they used symmetrical indexed gets, they would have failed). A code snippet that demonstrates the problem is below:
final IoBuffer buffer = IoBuffer.allocate(128);
buffer.putUnsignedInt(10, 0x87654321L);
buffer.putUnsignedInt(20, 0xFFFFFFFFL);
System.out.printf("buffer.getUnsignedInt(0) = 0x%08X\n", buffer.getUnsignedInt(0));
System.out.printf("buffer.getUnsignedInt(4) = 0x%08X\n", buffer.getUnsignedInt(4));
System.out.printf("buffer.getUnsignedInt(10) = 0x%08X\n", buffer.getUnsignedInt(10));
System.out.printf("buffer.getUnsignedInt(20) = 0x%08X\n", buffer.getUnsignedInt(20));
A trivial fix is required, which is to pass 'index' parameter to buf().putInt() or buf().putShort() method call.