Uploaded image for project: 'Derby'
  1. Derby
  2. DERBY-6061

Upgrade language is inconsistent

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 10.9.1.0
    • 10.10.1.1
    • Documentation
    • None

    Description

      In the Developer's Guide we describe two kinds of upgrade, "full" and "soft". I think we used to use the terms "hard" and "soft", and "hard" was changed to "full" to provide a more accurate description of what happens. There are still a few leftover occurrences of "hard" in the docs here and there.

      However, "soft" doesn't provide much indication of what happens in that kind of upgrade. Would "partial" be more correct? If not, is there a good alternative?

      I can go through the docs and fix the language based on whatever you all think makes sense.

      Attachments

        1. DERBY-6061-code2.stat
          0.2 kB
          Camilla Haase
        2. DERBY-6061-code2.diff
          3 kB
          Camilla Haase
        3. DERBY-6061-code.diff
          0.7 kB
          Camilla Haase
        4. derby-6061-chinese.diff
          2 kB
          Dag H. Wanvik
        5. DERBY-6061-3.diff
          7 kB
          Camilla Haase
        6. DERBY-6061-2.zip
          7 kB
          Camilla Haase
        7. DERBY-6061-2.diff
          7 kB
          Camilla Haase
        8. DERBY-6061.zip
          7 kB
          Camilla Haase
        9. DERBY-6061.stat
          0.2 kB
          Camilla Haase
        10. DERBY-6061.diff
          0.7 kB
          Camilla Haase
        11. cdevcsecureroles.html
          15 kB
          Camilla Haase

        Activity

          People

            chaase3 Camilla Haase
            chaase3 Camilla Haase
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            7 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: